"Spare No Effort" Reflects Social Mentality And Occupation Matching Degree.

"The investigation of" over 80% people consider themselves useless "should be screened and objectively analyzed.

Li Qiang, Dean of the school of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, said that it is generally accepted that the phenomenon of "big use of small quantities" is a subjective expression, but it does reflect a social mentality and is a sign of discontent.

"From a deeper level, this shows that our talent market mechanism is not perfect, there are loopholes and defects."

Li Qiang said.

According to Li Qiang analysis, there are two systems of talent allocation in China.

Under the planned economic system, human resources are allocated by the state, and the elements of administrative intervention are strong.

"At that time, the slogan was" everyone is a screw "," I am a brick of revolution, "and no one will mention the problem of big use.

After the reform and opening up, China has changed from planned economy to market economy.

Gradually, it has become a market allocation of talents.

"Talents are flowing in the market. If the market mechanism is perfect, everyone will find a job suitable for themselves, and there will be no sense of great use."

Li Qiang stressed that the key to the problem is that the time for establishing a socialist market economic system in China is too short, and the market mechanism is not perfect. In the process of finding jobs, people are disturbed by many factors outside the market, such as power, money, relationships, backgrounds and so on.

Li Qiang believed that a perfect and fair market mechanism is very important for the society to develop and the country to be strong.

Without a good mechanism, brain drain will be more serious.

He also said that we should also see that China's market mechanism is gradually improving.

For example, why is CCTV's Star Road column popular? It is very important to provide a stage for fair competition.

For example, many units are increasingly pparent, standardized, open recruitment and competition in talent selection and appointment, which not only bring vitality to enterprises, but also promote social progress.

The researcher of the Institute of population and labor economics, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that the problem of matching "big use" is not a unique phenomenon in China.

"We are working with the European Union on a new career and new skills project. We are looking at what kind of people and what kind of job matching problems we find.

If people's skills and social needs do not match, there will be a phenomenon of "big useless".

Due to the lagging educational reform, the talent education and social needs are out of line. Another important reason is the disconnection between the economic development structure and talent training, and the urgent need for skilled talents in the pformation of economic structure. The expansion of enrollment in Colleges and universities has caused more supply of ordinary talents, but the badly needed skilled talents in the society are in short supply.

People are dissatisfied with their work and have a sense of "big use". In addition to self-evaluation, they are largely related to the social evaluation system.

"China's existing evaluation system is relatively simple, basically is the money evaluation system, to measure a person's success, mainly depends on whether there is money.

The mainstream values of society are also misleading and misleading.

Li Qiang believes that under such an evaluation system, there are many contributions to society that have not been deserved.

Especially manual workers are not respected.

"Our country used to have eight levels of technology classification system. In a factory, a person can be a 4 level or 5 level worker.

Nowadays, the migrant workers have made great contributions to urban construction and development. Why do they call floating population and migrant workers? Look at foreign countries, Germany with the best manufacturing technology and high technology operation level, and also respect the various skilled workers most.

Li Qiang said.

To avoid wastage of talents and make people do their best, it is urgent to form a fair competition market mechanism, and promote the rational allocation of human resources and the equal competition environment for talent promotion.

At the same time, we must establish and perfect the talent evaluation system, which includes both self-evaluation and social evaluation system.

"What is good and what is small"? We should have a correct understanding of talents and have different criteria for success.

We can not simply define "timber" by money or education, nor equal the so-called "success" to the so-called "success".

The ancient oil selling Weng is a good example. There is something worth studying in ordinary work.

As long as the whole society forms the atmosphere of respecting the workers, people love their jobs and work well, and everyone will do well in their own division, and the overall level of the industry will be promoted. "

If the whole society can form the right one.

To a certain extent, it can also avoid the phenomenon of "high consumption of talents".

Some experts said that many state-owned enterprises, government agencies and institutions in the recruitment process generally raised the requirements of high academic qualifications, undergraduate or junior college students can complete the work, but raised the threshold to master or even Ph.D., the high consumption of this kind of talent has also caused a waste of talent.

Many experts in the interview said that the young people who sighed for "using large quantities of talents" should be down-to-earth and have a correct evaluation of themselves. They should not think of themselves as "big timber" because of their high academic qualifications, and despise their immediate work.

College students have knowledge and ability but lack practical experience.

Some experts believe that "big use" is a fake problem in itself. Any job is "dry". We can not expect "complaining" and "complaining" to bring good jobs and good jobs to us.

Du Yang suggested from the perspective of economic policy that during the period of economic structural pformation, the state should encourage employment innovation and pformation, stimulate young people's enthusiasm for starting their own businesses, and enable the return of talent investment to be reflected.

The government should create a good environment for entrepreneurship, improve basic social security and welfare, and strengthen support for small and micro enterprises.

In the operation of the labour market, the government should provide more information for businesses and individuals.

Du Yang, who has studied the employment problem for a long time, said that with the popularization of higher education in China, the number of university graduates is increasing.

But in the medium and long term, the improvement of the overall quality of labourers will surely promote the progress of productive forces.

On the other hand, colleges and universities should conform to the needs of society in terms of specialty setting, and create career planning and career design.

More importantly, from the beginning of basic education, we must pay attention to the protection and cultivation of independent consciousness, adventure spirit, innovative thinking and social responsibility.

Li Qiang said that from a different perspective, a group of graduates with higher education entered the industries of agriculture, home economics, sanitation and other industries, which not only explained the diversity of university students' employment concept, but also promoted the overall level of these industries in the long run.

"If college students can truly grow organic vegetables and keep organic pigs, it is also great."